Thread:Nbajammer/@comment-1352718-20140526054832/@comment-691135-20140526061813

The problem with that is we use References to cite sources. If we did that, then the References section becomes cluttered and a complete mess. The old pages looked like crap because people were turning them all into series summary pages and not rider summary pages. As for why people write in past tense, probably because the episode has aired and moved on to the next one. Sentai and Kamen Rider don't do re-runs, so by the time someone reads the article it will have already aired.

What I do think should be avoided, and I would caution editors against doing this, is putting so little info as to clutter the article with Storylink notations. If you write multiple things from one episode, you only need to Storylink one time (after the final item) not after each one. For example:

Huge point number one. Huge point number two. Huge point number three. Huge point number four.

Notice how I have four points with the same Storylink tag. Now compare that to this:

Huge point number one. Huge point number two. Huge point number three. Huge point number four.

In this case, we have the same 4 points, still all from the same episode, but one Storylink notation for the bunch.

Granted I want to think this is how it had been done, but if not it is how it should be. Pages can also be formatted to spread out the Storylink notations. We dont need a huge wall of text paragraph with 5 or 6 Storylinks in it. Keep it to 2 or 3 Storylinks per paragraph, and put enough content in such that they aren't jumbled together.

I think that would work a lot better, personally. Note that I do see your point, but I think all it does is shift the problem to the References section. Best we eliminate it instead.