Thread:Nbajammer/@comment-11479355-20151123012746/@comment-5555139-20151211162628

Nbabummer wrote: ...you didn't answer the question though.

You said you'd be happy to explain, and then did not. It's a simple question.

"Why is something that is not fact allowed to be used, when you say things that are not fact should not be used?" looks like he has another sockpuppet, not to mention making a mockery of Jammer's name.