Thread:Maharaja O Earth/@comment-24230823-20200205155423/@comment-24230823-20200206162322

Maharaja O Earth wrote: Anti-Villian is a villian whose target is not evil. It has to do nothing with good. Kamen Rider Idunn from Gaim Gaiden is considered an Anti-Villian. What was Diend's purpose that you consider evil/dark as in those villians like Shocker?

Swartz was not just morally questionable but also mentally evil. His actions towards Ora, Heure and Alpina justify this. Uh what...? That's not what an antivillain is all about. Not all antivillains target the heroes or their fellow villains and I can count many who've fought against both of them.

I just told you: ''An anti-villain is a type of villain with desired ends that are intended as good, but their methods of getting there range from evil to undesirable. The major difference between villains and anti-villains is that anti-villains would usually have more honorable traits.''

Kamen Rider Idunn is an antivillain because of her backstory and motivations. She did had targets whose both evil and good. She killed Takatora & Mitchy's father, who experimented on them and countless other children, as well as coming after the Kureshima brothers, even though they're the good guys. She wasn't really evil mostly, just a flawed character with a good intention.

As I tried telling you about Diend's purpose, he tried destroy all Super Sentai & Kamen Riders in the movie. That was a morally questionable and evil action that he commited! How can you explain that is considered antivillainous?